Fuck knows what Calendar know but they've just said it's understood Clark had already applied for the Leeds job before being sacked.
41
Lee Clark has left Huddersfield (Replaced by Grayson*)
Started by You Shit, Feb 15 2012 01:06 PM
football lufc
163 replies to this topic
#42
-
- Members
-
- 5,846 posts
- Joined 04-January 10
Distinguished tit
- Gender:Male
- Location:Boroughbridge
- Interests:SEXY BANTER
Posted 15 February 2012 - 06:14 PM
Perfect reasoning, replace grayson with a poor mans grayson.....
carry on kenneth.
carry on kenneth.
#44
Posted 15 February 2012 - 06:31 PM
Barry Shitpeas, on 15 February 2012 - 02:03 PM, said:
i hope to fuck he aint coming here!
might put a cheeky fiver on grayson next udders manager.
whats betting udders and wolves both have new managers before us
might put a cheeky fiver on grayson next udders manager.
whats betting udders and wolves both have new managers before us
No offence but that expression is so daft. Is it one where there's a bubble coming from the queen's muth saying 'oi cunt!'.
#45
-
- Members
-
- 3,514 posts
- Joined 02-January 10
Dooner Hero
- Gender:Male
-
Interests:India Reynolds
Beer
Wanking
Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:49 AM
Bud White, on 15 February 2012 - 06:31 PM, said:
No offence but that expression is so daft. Is it one where there's a bubble coming from the queen's muth saying 'oi cunt!'.
It's one where shes got a tash and tits out
#46 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:43 PM
I'd have Clark over either of Colin Wanker and Barnsley Chop thank you very much.
#47
-
- Admin [Admin]
-
- 10,137 posts
- Joined 05-December 09
Mawhinney
- Gender:Male
- Location:Madrid
- Interests:LUFC - THE KILLERS - WORKING THE GUNS - TONY JANSEN - LAMP
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:47 PM
begbie, on 17 February 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:
I'd have Clark over either of Colin Wanker and Barnsley Chop thank you very much.
Clarke over McCarthy.
Sometime I reckon you just go against common sense to be 'that' guy
#48 Guest_OneNightInMilan_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:55 PM
begbie, on 17 February 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:
I'd have Clark over either of Colin Wanker and Barnsley Chop thank you very much.
Why? There's nothing that Clark has ever done that would make him a better candidate than McCarthy, not that I think we're getting either.
#49 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:56 PM
Leodensian, on 17 February 2012 - 05:47 PM, said:
Clarke over McCarthy.
Sometime I reckon you just go against common sense to be 'that' guy
My opinion on the two experienced candidates is that I don't want a sideshow which both would unfortunately guarantee. And more importantly I think that their style of football is absolute dross, negative, Unimaginative and downright dull.
Lee Clark has a reasonable record and you don't get a 45 game unbeaten run for nothing.
I may be guilty of expressing the opposite opinion. But I'd rather that than constantly reiterating what's already been said (when I do agree with others). Forums are for debate and nodding dogs stifle that.
#50 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:57 PM
OneNightInMilan, on 17 February 2012 - 05:55 PM, said:
Why? There's nothing that Clark has ever done that would make him a better candidate than McCarthy, not that I think we're getting either.
#51
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:00 PM
begbie, on 17 February 2012 - 05:57 PM, said:
Better style of football and isn't an arse clown.
Wolves played some cracking football under McCarthy. Saw them against Villa last month and for large spells they were fantastic, as good as anything I've seen outside of the champions league contenders. Its a myth that his teams play long ball.
#52 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:06 PM
Fletch, on 17 February 2012 - 06:00 PM, said:
Wolves played some cracking football under McCarthy. Saw them against Villa last month and for large spells they were fantastic, as good as anything I've seen outside of the champions league contenders. Its a myth that his teams play long ball.
#53
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:13 PM
begbie, on 17 February 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:
I have a workmate who is a ST holder at the wolves. He and many like him have wanted McCarthy out for years. Stoke have spent less money in the same time and look where they are with their basic football. He is not good enough in my humblest and should not be considered.
Fans always want rid of managers. Even some scum fans want rid of your cuntryman. What do Wolves fans honestly expect? He strolled the championship with them, kept them in the prem for what, 3 years? And they're by no means certs to go down this year. He's assembled a decent squad with some good players who play good football. Unfortunately, when you are Wolverhampton fucking Wanderers, and in the Premier League, there are going to be lots of teams better than you. McCarthy made them competetive, which can be as much as can be realistically expected.
As for comparing them to Stoke, what time frame do you mean? last three years? I'd imagine the expendature of the two will be very similar, and to be fair to Tony Pulis, he has worked absolute miracles at that club. Not with no brass though. Spent millions on Crouch, Jones, Palacios, Pennant etc.
#55
-
- Members
-
- 2,634 posts
- Joined 24-January 10
transit driving gypo cunt
- Gender:Male
- Location:super leeds
-
Interests:illuminati
neil warnock
scrap metal
#56 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:23 PM
wiggi28, on 17 February 2012 - 06:18 PM, said:
18 draws
You only want Colin so that you can say I told you so, not in any true belief that he will improve our lot.
You're so transparent.
Side Before Self!!!
#57
Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:46 PM
begbie, on 17 February 2012 - 06:23 PM, said:
Draw > loss. Or am I missing something?
Rather win a game then lose one than 2 draws in a row.
If you'd rather have a manager who has failed promotion with money given to him at a lower level, than two who have done it at a higher level I really don't know what to say...
#58 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:56 PM
Tommy Vercetti, on 17 February 2012 - 10:46 PM, said:
Rather win a game then lose one than 2 draws in a row.
If you'd rather have a manager who has failed promotion with money given to him at a lower level, than two who have done it at a higher level I really don't know what to say...
You don't have to say anything ... As I sincerely doubt that you have anything of value to add.
They lost in the playoff final in a one off game. And are currently 4th behind teams could arguably be in the top division. Are you forgetting how hard we found promotion from division 3?
#59
Posted 17 February 2012 - 11:03 PM
begbie, on 17 February 2012 - 10:56 PM, said:
You could start with actually reading what I posted. How many games during that 45 league game unbeaten spell did they lose? None. So your rationale is utter bollocks.
You don't have to say anything ... As I sincerely doubt that you have anything of value to add.
They lost in the playoff final in a one off game. And are currently 4th behind teams could arguably be in the top division. Are you forgetting how hard we found promotion from division 3?
You don't have to say anything ... As I sincerely doubt that you have anything of value to add.
They lost in the playoff final in a one off game. And are currently 4th behind teams could arguably be in the top division. Are you forgetting how hard we found promotion from division 3?
Yeah, but that big 45 league game unbeaten run is blown out of proportion. Yes, it was a great effort. But to have 18 draws is a lot. I simply said I'd rather not of gone unbeaten and had 9 losses and 9 wins to them 18 draws, more points that way.
I wouldn't have anything to say to it as I'd be lost for words, so yeah your right. But it's more down to a stupid point from you rather than one that proves me wrong.
We found it hard, but one season we were massively against all odds and still got as far as they did. The next we had McAllister for half a season, went on a 5 game losing streak (I think it was) and that again made it harder, but we still got the playoffs. Then we did get promoted. That's 3 seasons, 3 different managers. He had 3 seasons and all the money in the league to get them up but failed... With the usual we'll go that next step further next time.
#60 Guest_begbie_*
-
- Guests
- Joined --
Posted 17 February 2012 - 11:09 PM
Tommy Vercetti, on 17 February 2012 - 11:03 PM, said:
Yeah, but that big 45 league game unbeaten run is blown out of proportion. Yes, it was a great effort. But to have 18 draws is a lot. I simply said I'd rather not of gone unbeaten and had 9 losses and 9 wins to them 18 draws, more points that way.
I wouldn't have anything to say to it as I'd be lost for words, so yeah your right. But it's more down to a stupid point from you rather than one that proves me wrong.
We found it hard, but one season we were massively against all odds and still got as far as they did. The next we had McAllister for half a season, went on a 5 game losing streak (I think it was) and that again made it harder, but we still got the playoffs. Then we did get promoted. That's 3 seasons, 3 different managers. He had 3 seasons and all the money in the league to get them up but failed... With the usual we'll go that next step further next time.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
